May 31 2010
Is It Time To Change Your Approach To Sales Training?

The first step for any company deciding to make a change in their sales approach is always an assessment of the situation. What processes and methods are currently being employed by the company? What has their sales performance been? What percentage of salespeople are meeting quota? What are the biggest obstacles to success? How dynamic or stable is the company’s environment? What are the practices and expectations of the buyers? These are only a few considerations.
Training must be based on what the salespeople need and should be tailored to address diagnosed performance gaps. Using a diagnostic approach, a formal sales team skills audit saves an organization money and time because there is nothing to be gained from teaching people something they are already doing well — or, conversely, that they don’t need to do in the first place.
A well-targeted program is far more likely to engage participants’ full interest because they’ll see its immediate relevance to their daily results.
Any training program will be more effective when the skills that participants learn are reinforced on a regular and continual basis. For maximum impact, every level of management must reinforce training. Such reinforcement can come in many forms, but the best way is for the sales manager to serve as a “model of excellence” who provides an ongoing demonstration of required skills so salespeople begin to live and breathe them.
Choosing the Right Training Company for Your Needs
Most sales-training companies have a unique philosophy and therefore a specialized approach. Perhaps they are strong in the area of selling business value to board-level members at the expense of competitive positioning. Perhaps attention on strategies for winning very complex sales situations dilutes their efforts toward working with students on the details and tactics that they need to execute in order to win — down to the actual words they need to be saying and to whom.
A training company that specializes in one or more areas of sales expertise will not necessarily perceive or look for your requirements in other areas. If the training/consulting provider is left to define your approach, there will more than likely be a gap in the methodology, and of course a resultant gap in the subsequent training.
One way to handle this is to employ two independent providers. One would assist in assessing your situation, defining your requirements, and perhaps in building your methodology. The second would provide the training and would be evaluated and selected based upon their ability to meet your specific (and complete) requirement set. That would ensure that the first provider would not be defining your requirements to meet their expertise.
The best alternative is to employ a firm that is completely independent of any training or sales consulting provider and can offer the proper guidance throughout these steps to achieve the best possible result. Important to any company that makes an investment in sales team development is measurement.
Benchmarking current levels of performance, setting reasonable goals and objectives based upon a careful assessment of the situation, and measuring progress against those goals is a necessary — but for the most part overlooked — component of most training initiatives.
When progress is at or above expectations, everyone is encouraged, motivated and continues to perform and excel. If expectations are not being met, the opportunity exists for immediate problem diagnosis and adjustment, assuring that the initiative will get back on track and provide the return on investment expected.
PS: Having mentioned sales team skills auditing, it would be negligent of me not to remind you of ASP Profile from the JF Consultancy – I rarely self-publicize, so do please indulge me – details HERE



“Why are important meetings at Boden known as Shags?








